*ACL Submission Checklist
Print this. Tape it above your desk. Walk through it the day before submission.
Content
- One-sentence research question is in the introduction.
- Contributions list is concrete (not "we propose a method").
- Headline result is in the abstract by sentence four.
- Every section serves the central argument.
- Figures and tables are readable in grayscale.
- All claims are supported by experiments or citations.
- Results are reported with variance (≥3 seeds where feasible).
- Strongest available baselines are included or absence is justified.
Writing
- Paper read aloud end-to-end at least once.
- No undefined acronyms.
- Notation is consistent throughout.
- No unverified "novel" / "first" claims.
- Figure and table captions are self-contained paragraphs.
- No "utilize," "leverage," "delve," "in conclusion."
Structure
- Limitations section is present, substantive, and honest.
- Ethical Considerations section is present if relevant.
- References use ACL Anthology versions where available.
- Every citation has been verified to exist.
- Appendices contain only supplementary material.
Reproducibility
- Number of model parameters reported.
- Hyperparameter ranges and selection criterion reported.
- Random seeds and number of runs reported.
- Total compute (GPU type × hours) reported.
- Licenses for all data, models, and code listed.
- Code release plan stated (anonymized link for review).
Submission Logistics
- Anonymized: no author names or affiliations; self-citations in the third person.
- Acknowledgments and identifying funding/grant numbers removed from the review version.
- PDF metadata clean — no author name in the file's document properties.
- No links to non-anonymous repositories (use an anonymized mirror).
- Page limits respected (Limitations, Ethics, References, Appendix do not count).
- Responsible NLP Checklist filled out.
- PDF compiled with the correct year's ACL style file.
- Ran
aclpubcheckon the PDF; margin, font, page-limit, and citation errors fixed.
The reviewer test
Pretend you are a tired reviewer with eight more papers to read. Where would you stop reading?
That is where you have more work to do.
Part of The Missing NLP Paper Guide.